A Department of Homeland Security test at Hudson Yards in New York City scored the DJI Matrice 4T at 4.6 out of 5, compared to Skydio X10D's 3.7 and Parrot Anafi USA's 2.4. DHS did not disclose these scores in its public report.
What's happening
- DHS National Urban Security Technology Laboratory tested DJI Matrice 4T and 30T drones in Hudson Yards alongside approved Blue UAS platforms including Skydio X10D and Parrot Anafi USA.
- DJI Matrice 4T scored 4.6 overall with 4.9 ratings for regular camera, thermal camera, and command and control link quality in a challenging urban RF and GPS environment.
- Skydio X10D scored 3.7; Parrot Anafi USA scored 2.4. DJI Matrice 30T scored 4.3 overall but experienced one significant failure when it drifted into a building during a nighttime flight.
- The public DHS report acknowledged covered-nation drones were tested but withheld specific scores, stating results were available only upon request to public safety agencies.
Why it matters
- Blue UAS alternatives are intended to provide domestic options for federal agencies restricted from using foreign drones, but this test suggests performance gaps favor the restricted platforms.
- Withholding operational performance data from public disclosure raises questions about whether restrictions are driven by security assessment or industrial base protection for nascent domestic competitors.
- First responders and federal agencies cannot make informed procurement decisions when the government conducts comparative testing but hides performance results from decision makers.
Going deeper
- DHS stated the assessment examined operator experience and did not evaluate or determine national security risk, limiting what conclusions can be drawn about cybersecurity differences.
- DHS classified certain National Urban Security Technology Laboratory findings as For Official Use Only due to sensitive operational information, explaining the public report omission.
- DJI Matrice 4T cost DHS approximately $12,958 per unit and Matrice 30T approximately $18,608, though those prices appear above standard retail rates.
The intrigue
- DHS disadvantages listing for DJI aircraft cited cybersecurity concerns and economic benefit to a covered nation rather than performance deficits, suggesting policy may conflate security risk with industrial policy.
- One of two Matrice 30Ts tested failed catastrophically in challenging conditions, yet DHS still assigned it a 4.3 score, raising questions about how failures weighted against overall performance ratings.
The fine print
- Test results were classified For Official Use Only and restricted to request-based access for public safety agencies, preventing public evaluation of government testing.
- DHS assessment scope explicitly excluded national security risk evaluation, meaning test scores do not address cybersecurity vulnerability claims.